SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 144

K.S.GUPTA
KUMARI HARPRIT KAUR – Appellant
Versus
SARDAR KANWALJIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C.SINGHA, S.D.SHARMA, Vijay Kishan, VIKRAM JAITLEY

K. S. Gupta. J.

( 1 ) MANOHAR Lal Sharma, his wife Smt. Satyawati Sharma and son Gajender Sharma have filed application under Order 1 Rule 10 Civil Procedure Code etc. alleging that Sardar Kanwaljit Singh, defendant No. 1 was the co-owner in property No. 1-C/35, New Rohtak Road, Delhi and after the family settlement dated August 2, 1989 he bacame exclusive owner of the portion of the property which fell to his share. Defendant No. 1 entered into an agreement to sell his share in the aforesaid property to the applicants and he received part sale consideration. Possession of the part of the property was also given by him to the applicants.

( 2 ) THIS partition suit has been filed to delay the execution of the sale deed and to deprive the applicants of their right in the aforesaid property. Applicants are very much interested in the suit. It was prayed that they may be allowed to be impleaded as defendants in the suit.

( 3 ) PLAINTIFFS and also defendant No. 1 have contested the application by filing replies. In the reply filed by defendant No. 1 it is, inter alia, alleged that the alleged agreement to sell is based on misrepresentations. The applicants do not have either sufficient f







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top