SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 164

JASPAL SINGH
ASHOK KUMAR CHHABRA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.VADHVANI

Jaspal Singh, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners who claim to be the owners of what is commonly known as Mobile Bitumen Concrete Mixing Plant filed a writ petition against the Union of India and Delhi Pollution Control Committee besides others for a direction to the respondents not to interfere in any manner in the working of that plant. It appears that the Supreme Court holding that the running of such plants was hazardous and noxious and, therefore, required to be immediately stopped, had passed orders for relocation of such plants including the plant of the petitioners. The petitioners in the writ petition in question took the position that as they had adopted a modern technology with an inbuilt pollution control devices their plant could neither be held as hazardous nor noxious. Their grievance was that as their plant was non-polluting the authorities could not legally act under the Air Prevention and Control of Pollution Act, 1981.

( 2 ) ON September 24, 1997 when the matter was taken up by Hon. Mr. Justice Arun Kumar it was found that the impugned order was appealable and that the petitioners had actually filed an appeal but before a wrong Forum. A direction was thus given that another








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top