SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 234

D.K.JAIN
SHILA AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
INFOCOM DIGITAL SYSTEMS LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL SAPRA, D.K.GARG

D. K. Jain, J.

( 1 ) THIS is defendant s application under Section 16 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short the CPC) for rejection of the plaint/dismissal of suit on the ground that this Court does not have territorial jurisdiction to try the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff has filed the present suit for specific porformance, mandatory and permanent injunction, praying for a decree for specific performance of the agreement to sell an industrial plot, bearing No. 52, Sector-34, Gurgaon Technology Park, Gurgaon (Haryana), for which the entire sale consideration stands paid. Alternatively, if the decree for spedfic performance cannot be granted, the plaintiff has prayed for a decree for a sum of Rs. 20 lacs alongwith interest @ 30% per annum or market value of the said plot, whichever is higher, alongwith future interest. She has also prayed for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from alienating, mortgaging, selling or transferring the said. property to anybody else. Plaintiff s case is that in the last week of September, 1995, the defendant, a public limited company, through its Director Mr. S. L. Rastogi, known to the plaintiff, approached her for adv










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top