SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 223

A.K.SRIVASTAVA
FAROOQ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.J.S.AHLUVALIA, O.P.Soni

A. K. Srivastava, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for setting aside order dated 11. 11. 97 passed by Mr. D. S. Paweriya, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi, in Crl. A. No. 3/97 and order dated 9. 11. 97 passed by Mr. Gurdeep Singh Saini. Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi. Copies of the aforesaid two orders are on the record at pages 4 to 8 and pages 9 to 10 respectively.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that the four petitioners herein were convicted and sentenced under Sections 365, 452, 380 and 448, Indian Penal Code in a case arising out of FIR 872/78 by orders dated 7. 7. 90 and 26. 7. 89 respectively. An appeal against the conviction and sentence being Crl. A. 3/97 was filed by the convicts. That appeal was taken up for hearing by Mr. D. S. Paweriya ASJ. It appears that during the course of hearing of the appeal, the learned Additional Sessions Judge was told that no fine was imposed under Sections 365, 380 and 452, Indian Penal Code though these sections make it mandatory for imposition of fine. Consequently the learned Additional Sessions Judge on agreement remanded the case to the trial court with the direction to pass sen











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top