High Court Of Delhi
MAHENDER PAL SINGH - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA - Respondent
Civil 3983 of 1994
Decided On : 03/23/1998
INVALID PENSION - CCS (PENSION) RULES, 1972 - RULE 38, 49 - INTERPRETATION - INVALID PENSION ADMISSIBLE TO GOVERNMENT SERVANT RETIRING ON ACCOUNT OF BODILY OR MENTAL INFIRMITY PERMANENTLY INCAPACITATING HIM FOR SERVICE, IRRESPECTIVE OF COMPLETION OF QUALIFYING SERVICE OF 10 YEARS - RULE 49 PROVIDES FOR QUANTUM OF PENSION.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a CRPF officer, sustained an injury during service and was declared permanently incapacitated by a Medical Board. He applied for invalid pension under Rule 38 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, but was denied on the ground that he had not completed 10 years of qualifying service as required under Rule 49.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that Rule 38 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, which provides for invalid pension, does not stipulate any minimum qualifying service. The court interpreted Rule 38 and 49 together and concluded that invalid pension is admissible to a government servant who retires due to bodily or mental infirmity permanently incapacitating him for service, irrespective of the completion of 10 years of qualifying service. The court also noted that the Department of Pension and Pensioners' Welfare had issued a letter clarifying that there is no minimum service requirement for invalid pension.
Issues: 1. Whether invalid pension under Rule 38 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, is admissible only after completion of 10 years of qualifying service as per Rule 49? 2. Whether the petitioner, who was permanently incapacitated during service, is entitled to invalid pension despite not completing 10 years of service?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. Rule 38 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, provides for invalid pension to a government servant who retires due to bodily or mental infirmity permanently incapacitating him for service, without specifying any minimum qualifying service. 2. Rule 49 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, which deals with the amount of pension, provides for a proportionate amount of pension for those who retire before completing 33 years of qualifying service, but does not impose a minimum service requirement for invalid pension. 3. The court interpreted Rules 38 and 49 together and concluded that the intention of the rules is to grant invalid pension to those who suffer injuries or incapacitation during service, irrespective of the length of service.
Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to fix the petitioner's pension based on his 8 years and 7 months of service, as per Rule 49 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The amount was to be credited to the petitioner's bank account.
( 1 ) ON the 6th of November, 1984, the petitioner was examined by the Medical Board and the following report was given about his physical condition:
"i. CERTIFIED that I/wehave carefully examined No. 761010117 NK RO Mahinder Pal Singh, s/o Late Shri Babu Ram in the Base Hospital No. I, CRPF, New Delhi. His age by his own statement is 35 years and by appearance about 35 years. l (We) consider No. 761010117 NK RO Mahinder Pal Singh s/o late Shri Babu Ram to be completely and permanently incapacitated for further service of any kind in the Department to which he belongs in consequent of Head Injury (Effect of) (here state disease or cause ). His incapacity does not appear to rne/ us to have been caused by irregular or intemperate habits. "
( 2 ) THAT he had served on the date when he sustained injury for eight years and seven months is common ground. The petitioner claimed pension on the basis of the medical report because he was not in a position to serve in view of his ill-health, and that was not given to him. Therefore, he has approached this Court claiming the relief under Rule 38 (3) of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 as invalid pension.
( 3 ) THE answer by the respondent is that one must have served for ten years before one became eligible to claim pension and inasmuch as the petitioner admittedly had not served for ten years, he would not be entitled to pension.
( 4 ) THEREFORE, the question is: Whether as per the terms of the Rule 38 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 the petitioner would not be entitled to invalid pension? Rule 38 of the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972 reads as under:
" (1) Invalid pension may be granted if a Government servant retires from the service on account of any bodily or mental infirmity which permanently incapacitates him for the service. (2) A Government servant applying for an invalid pension shall submit a medical certificate of incapacity from the following Medical Authority, namely: (a) a Medical Board in the case of a Gazetted Government servant and of a non-gazetted Government servant whose pay, as defined in Rule 9 (21) of the Fundamental Rules, exceeds 2[two thousand and two hundred rupees] per mensem; (b) Civil Surgeon or a District Medical Officer or Medical Officer of equivalent status in other cases. Note 1.-No medical certificate of incapacity for service may be granted unless the applicant produces a letter to show that the Head of his Office or Department is aware of the intention of the applicant to appear before the medical authority. The medical authority shall also be supplied by the Head of the Office or Department in which the applicant is employed with a statement of what appears from official records to be the age of the applicant. If a service book is being maintained for the applicant, the age recorded therein should be reported. Note 2.-A lady doctor shall be included as a member of the Medical Board when a woman candidate is to be examined. (3) The form of the Medical Certificate to be granted by the medical authority specified in sub-rule (2) shall be as in Form 23. (4) Where the medical authority referred to in sub-rule (2) has declared a Government servant fit for further service of less laborious character than that which he had been doing, he should, provided he is willing to be so employed, be employed on lower post and if there be no means of employing him even on a lower post, he may be admitted to invalid pension. (5) Deleted. "
( 5 ) ACCORDING to the respondents, under Rule 38, the amount of pension could be fixed on an officer completing qualifying service of ten years and, therefore, by applying Rule 49, the amount of pension for the petitioner cannot be fixed as he had not completed qualifying service of ten years. Rule 49, which speaks of amount of pension, reads as under:
" 1 [ (1) In the case of a Government servant retiring in accordance with the provisions of these rules before completing qualifying service often years, the amount of service g
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.