SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 273

LOKESHWAR PRASAD
ROADMASTER CYCLE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SUSHMA NANGIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.N.AGRAWAL, V.K.Dhar

Lokeshwar Prasad, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall govern the disposal of the two applications (C. M. 1073 and C. M. 1074/98), both filed on behalf of the petitioner, under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC ) for restoring the Civil Revision Petition (CR 160/97), dismissed in default of the appearance of the petitioner on 18th March, 1998, to its original number and also for grant for interim stay.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the disposal of the abovementioned two applications lie in a narrow compass. Feeling aggrieved by an order dated the 18th September, 1996, passed by the learned Additional District Judge in Execution No. 37/96 entitled Smt. Sushma Nangia v. Roadmaster Industres Ltd. , the petitioner filed a Civil Revision Petition (C. R. 160/97- Mis. Roadmaster Cycle Ltd. v. Smt. Sushma Nangia) under Section 115, CPC. Alongwith the Civil Revision. the petitioner also filed an application under Section 151, Civil Procedure Code for interim orders. The learned predecessor of this Court, vide order dated 9. 5. 1997, directed issuance of a show cause notice to the respondent asking the respondent to show cause as to why the Revision Pe












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top