SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 262

LOKESHWAR PRASAD
S. C. SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Jayant Bhushan, RAKESH BHARDVAJ, S.N.MARVAH, V.K.Makhija, Vandana Khurana

Lokeshwar Prasad, J.

( 1 ) THIS order shall dispose of two applications (IA 4013/95 and IA 7894/95) - one filed by the plaintiffs under Order XXXIX, Rule? I and 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the CPC ) and the other one filed on behalf of defendant No. 2 under Order XXXIX, Rule 4 read with Section 151, Civil Procedure Code for the discharge/variation/ setting aside the order dated the 9th May, 1995, passed in IA 4013/95.

( 2 ) THE facts relevant for the disposal of the above mentioned two applications. briefly stated are, that the plaintiffs have filed a suit for permanent injunction with the prayer that a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using any part of the land, measuring 4000 sq. mtrs ( as shown in the plan annexed with the plaint) for any other purpose except a children s park, be passed in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants. It is further prayed by the plaintiffs that defendant No. 2 be restrained by a decree of permanent injunction from digging or making any construction on the abovesaid plot of land, situated in Ashok Vihar, Phase IV, SFS Flats, Delhi. As per the case








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top