SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 287

S.N.KAPUR
KANAHI RAM – Appellant
Versus
KARTAR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Harish Malhotra, SHYAM MURJANI

S. N. Kapoor, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENT Nos. 1 and 2 have filed IA No. 5750/97 seeking rejection of the petition under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter called the "the Act") under Order 7, Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code on ground that the partnership firm not being registered, the petition is barred by Section 69 (1) of the Partners Act, 1932.

( 2 ) BEFORE considering the objection, firstly, relevant facts in brief are require to be taken note of.

( 3 ) THE petitioner and the respondents entered into a partnership agreement on 8th February, 1990 in relation to cinema business including canteen and cycle stand or by any other source by using the cinema building belonging to the partnership firm. The petitioner has claimed rendition of accounts relating to cycle stand and the canteen of Kalyan Cinema from 1986 onwards and to pay share of the petitioner to the extent of 31. 66%. The petitioner further seeks reference of the petition under the arbitration clause which reads as under :

"15. That any dispute or difference arising between the parties or their legal representative or heirs regarding the interpretation of the contents of this deed or in respect of any matter rel





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top