SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 379

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
SARJIT SINGH SAHARAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.VALI, Digamber Singh

K. Ramamoorthy, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner joined the Indian Army in the rank of Lieutinent and he was working on the date of filing of the writ petition as Lt. Col. He has now sought the following reliefs:

A) Quashing the impugned order of Government of India vide their letter No. 36501/23/ac/89/ms/compl/3271/d (MS) dated 9th August, 1996 as well as any uncommunicated adverse/advisory/remarks in the Confidential Report by IO/ro/sro/or Head of the Department; and b) Issue writ of Mandamus to hold fresh selection Board for promotion to the rank of Lt. Col. /col.

( 2 ) IN April 1992, the petitioner made a statutory complaint praying for setting aside the following ACRs:

A) The complete ACR of 1985-86 including the assessment of IO, RO, SRO and NSRO (if any ). b) The complete ICR for the period o1 Jun 86 to 22 Sep 86 including the assessment of the RO, SRO and NSRO (if any ).

( 3 ) BY an order dated 9th August 1996 that was rejected by the Government of India. In para 6 of the writ petition the petitioner would state:

THAT the petitioner having displayed his professional competence of highest order as required of an officer having earned his well deserved confidential reports from his Comma























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top