ARUN KUMAR, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
ASHOK CHAUDHRY – Appellant
Versus
INDERJIT SANDHU – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal, directed against the judgment and decree dated 15. 7. 1997 of the Additional District Judge, Delhi, pertains to a contest between the respondent No. 1/plaintiff seeking a decree for recovery of possession of the suit premises after termination of the licence, on the one hand and the appellant defendant No. 2 on the other wanting to continue as a tenant without being evicted therefrom.
( 2 ) ACCORDING to the case set up by the plaintiff in the plaint, defendant No. 1 was allowed to occupy the barsati floor of the property bearing No. F-9, South Extension, 11, Ring Road, New Delhi (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the suit premises ) as a licensee as he was friend of her son, who is presently living abroad. Defendant No. 2 being a friend of the defendant No. 1, was a frequent visitor to her house. In the month of May, 1991, the defendant No. 2 came to reside with the defendant No. 1 for a week after obtaining oral permission from the plaintiff. In the meantime the defendant No. 1 vacated the suit premises but the defendant No. 2 avoided to vacate the same on one protext or the other. However, in August, 1991 the plaintiff terminated his licence a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.