SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 349

MANMOHAN SARIN, K.N.POPLI
RAMESHWAR DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
RENT CONTROLLER TRIBUNAL DELHI – Respondent


MANMOHAN SARIN

( 1 ) "petitioner has filed this petition aggrieved by the order dated 7th April, 1998, passed by the Rent Control Tribunal. The Rent Control Tribunal by the said order dismissed the appeal preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 1. 10. 1993, by which the application of the respondent OCM Shriram Consolidated Ltd. , under Order XXII Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, was allowed by the learned Additional Rent Controller; By the said order the learned Additional Rent Controller permitted respondent DCM Shriram Consolidated ltd. to be substituted in place of M/s. DCM ltd. , who were the original petitioner in the eviction petition.

( 2 ) THE respondent DCM Ltd. had filed the eviction petition, under. Clause I of proviso to Section 14 (1) and Section 22 of the Delhi Rent Contol Act, alleging that the petitioner, by virtue of being in employment of M/s. Swatantra Bharat Mills was allotted quarter No. B-219, Swatantra Bharat Mips Colony, New Delhi. Petitioner had retired from service and ceased to be in employment, yet,he continued to occupy the said quarter. M/s. Swatantra Bharat Mills was one of the units of M/ s. DCM Ltd.

( 3 ) DURING the pendency o





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top