Anil Dev Singh, J.

( 1 ) THESE revisions are directed against the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge dated January 30, 1996 whereby the appeals against the order dated July 17, 1995 of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi convicting the revisionist under section 162 read with section 220 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short the Act ) were dismissed.

( 2 ) THE Registrar of Companies filed complaints against the petitioner, Shri Moti Lal Bhatia and Smt. Suman Bhatia, Directors of M/s. Nirman Chit Fund Private Ltd. in the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi on June 11, 1992 under sections 159 and 162 of the Act on the ground that the petitioner and the abovesaid two others did not submit the annual returns and balance sheets of the company, M/s. Nirman Chit Fund Pvt. Ltd. for the years 1987-88, 1988-89, 1989-90 and 1990-91 within the prescribed period, thus flouting the provisions of sections 159, 220 read with section 162 of the Act. The learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate came to the conclusion that it was the petitioner alone who was liable for the default in submitting the annual returns and balance sheets for the year

Click Here to Read the rest of this document