SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 459

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
OM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
BRIJ BHUSHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.S.Sidhu, MALDIP SIDHU, V.K.Makhija, Vandana Khurana

K. Ramamoorthy, J.

( 1 ) THE plaintiff has filed the suit for injunction simplicitor. Pending the suit, in the application I. A. 4451/93, he has prayed for injunction. He claims tenancy with reference to the basement and ground floor in premises No. 18-A, New Colony, (Jhabu Mal Colony), Behind Filmistan Cinema, New Delhi on a rent of Rs. 750. 00 per month from the mother of the plaintiff Mrs. Pushpa Wanti He also claims tenancy with reference to basement, first floor, 2nd floor, terrace portion and open space (rear at back on the ground floor) of an extent of 45 x 12 on a monthly rent of Rs. 2,700. 00 from Smt. Pushpa Wanti. The case of the plaintiff could be tersely stated in the following terms.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff s father was Manohar Lal, mother was Smt. Pushpa Wanti. They had four sons and one daughter. Benarsi Lal, Om Parkash (plaintiff), Brij Bhushan (first defendant), Surinder and Usha Rani (second defendant ). Surinder is no more. His widow is Veena Makkar. During his lifetime, late Manohar Lal executed a Will on 4. 4. 1972 with reference to the premises bearing No. 18-A giving life interest to Smt. Pushpa Wanti and vested remained in his four sons Banarsi Lal, Surinder

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top