SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 530

A.D.SINGH
BAKER HUGHES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
HIROO KHUSHALANI – Respondent


Anil Dev Singh, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application whereby the plaintiffs seek to restrain the defendants by means of a temporary injunction from using the trade mark and trade name BAKER or any other trade mark or trade name deceptively similar thereto as their corporate name or as a part thereof. The facts necessary for the disposal of the application are as under: The first plaintiff Baker Hughes Limited (formerly known as Baker International Limited) is a company organised under the laws of United Kingdom. The principal place of business is located in Warwick Street, London. The second plaintiff Baker Hughes Incorporated is a company organised under the laws of Delaware, United States of America. Its principal place of business is located at Houston,, Texas (hereinafter, for short, the group of baker or baker Hughes companies collectively shall be referred to as "baker" or "baker Hughes" ). The second plaintiff is a parent company of the first plaintiff and is stated to own the trade mark BAKER.

( 2 ) THE first defendant Mr. Hiroo Khushalani is the Chief Executive Officer and Managing Director of the second defendant. The second defendant Baker Oil Tools (India) Private Limite



































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top