K. Ramamoorthy, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has challenged the order of termination dated the 26th of February, 1993.

( 2 ) THE facts necessary to be noticed are: The petitioner was working with the second respondent from 3. 4. 1984 as Geophysicist. According to the petitioner, on the 6th of July, 1984 he was transferred to Delhi from Dehradun. In 1987, the petitioner was transferred again to Dehradun. While he was working in Dehradun, he developed Kidney trouble and he was REFERRED TO to All-India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi. On the 22nd of April, 1987, he was transferred to Delhi on compassionate grounds. His wife was employed in Delhi Administration School. He wanted to continue in Delhi but he was transferred on the 7th of November, 1987 to Bombay. On the 24th of November, 1987, he requested for cancellation of his transfer. In 1988, he was transferred to Delhi. In 1990, the petitioner was transferred to the Bombay Unit of the second respondent. By letter dated the 2nd of April, 1990, he made a representation for his being retained in Delhi. His representation was not considered favourably. On the 9th of September, 1990, the elder brother of the petitioner died. His transf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document