1998 Supreme(Del) 631
High Court Of Delhi
C.BHASKAR RAO - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA - Respondent
Decided On : 08/24/1998
Headnote:Constitution of India Article 226 — Acquiescence and waiver — Failure to seek redress with promptitude-Acquiescence in the arrangement by seeking benefit of the same — Subsequent petition challenging the arrangement of management of statutory council.
Dentist Act, 1948 - Section 7, 5 & 20 — President of Council — Arrangement of sharing the seat of President between two candidates for specified period of time — The challenge to arrangement after availing its benefit — Arrangement approved by the Council and the Government — Subsequent petition challenging the arrangement, is not maintainable.
( 1 ) PETITIONER, Dr. C. Bhaskara Rao was elected as Vice President of the Dental Council of India (hereinafter called the Council) in the meeting of the Council held on 15th May,1996. He has assailed the arrangement of sharing by virtue of which Dr. R. K. Bali, respondent No. 3 has been appointed as the President of the Council. His challenge is primarily based on two counts namely; (1) that two persons cannot share the tenure of the office of the President. The tenure of the post of President is for five years. It cannot be divided. (2) Secondly arrangement of sharing of the post of President or rotation of the tenure amongst two persons is against the Dentist Act,1948 (hereinafter called the Act) and the election regulations. Since the election of November,1995 has been set aside and even otherwise no one got absolute majority in that election held in November,1995, hence no one could have been appointed to work as President. In the absence of a President it is always the Vice President who officiate, act and perform the duties and responsibilities of a President. In the event of there being a tie i. e. when two persons secured the same number of votes, then the election of that post has to be held afresh. Those persons cannot by mutual private arrangement split the tenure of the President into two parts. In the case of tie nobody gets elected. There has to be fresh elections and till such time fresh elections are held, the duties and responsibilities of the post of President are to be performed by the Vice President which in this case means the petitioner. Thus, according to petitioner, the arrangement of sharing being bad consequently the appointment of Dr. Bali is illegal and void.
( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the challenge laid by the petitioner, we must grasp few facts relevant for the determination of these questions. The Dental Council of India, a body corporate under the Act, functions through its elected Members. Dr. R. K. Bali was the President of the Council. His term expired in October,1994. Accordingly, the then Vice President Dr. Shetty assumed charge as Acting President of the Council per the Regulation No. 35. In November,1995 the General Body of the Council decided to hold election for the post of President. Dr. R. K. Bali, Dr. L. K. Gandhi and Dr. Sridhar Shetty came in the fray for the post of President. Total votes polled were 63, out of which one vote was declared invalid. The outcome of that fray was that Dr. Bali and Dr. Shetty secured 22 votes each, whereas Dr. Gandhi secured 18 votes. Since there was a tie between Dr. Bali and Dr. Shetty, it became difficult to untangle the knot. The Council, therefore, decided to refer the matter for opinion to the Central Government. Legal opinion was also received by the Council from its Advocate. However, at the intervention of the Health Minister Dr. Shetty and Dr. Bali arrived at an agreement to share the tenure of the post of President. The agreed proposal to share the tenure of the office of President was submitted to the Central Government. This arrangement of sharing of the tenure of the President was also put to the House. The House unanimously approved the proposal and the arrangement of sharing. On the other hand the Under Secretary, Ministry of Health vide letter dated 30th April,1996 conveyed to the Council that proposal submitted by it had been kept on record. This reply of the Central Government was treated by the Council as the decision of the Central Government i. e. approval of the sharing arrangement. The Secretary of the Council accordingly issued a general circular dated 8th May,1996 informing all concerned that Dr. Shetty would take over as President of the Council and his tenure shall continue till 16th January,1998, and thereafter, Dr. Bali would take over as President on 17th January,1998. Thus in the General Body Meeting of 15th/16th May,1996 Dr. Shetty was declared President of the Council. Dr. Shetty before being elected a