SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 759

USHA MEHRA
GE CAPITAL TRANSPORTATION FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DEE PHARMA LIMITED – Respondent


Usha Mehra, J.

( 1 ) THE short point for consideration is whether the petitioner can ask for appointment of a Receiver regarding the property of a Company against which reference has been registered by the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (in short BIFR ).

( 2 ) THE petitioner has based its claim for the appointment of a Receiver primarily on the ground that respondent Company approached the petitioner to help it financially in obtaining plant and machinery on lease basis. Respondent Company represented itself to be financially sound and assured the petitioner that it would be able to meet its commitments. It pursuaded the petitioner to agree to get on lease the plant and machinery which the respondent wanted to purchase. However, subsequently it was agreed between the parties that the plant and machinery would be hired by the petitioner for the respondent. In this regard Hire Purchase Agreement was executed between the parties. Term of the agreement indicated the owner of the plant and machinery, respondent company as the Hirer and the Managing Director of the respondent company as the guarantor. This Hire Purchase Agreement was executed on 15th April,1996. The pe










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top