SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 733

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
LILAWATI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


K. Ramamoorthy, J.

( 1 ) SHRI Harikishan Singh, who had left benind substantial items of money and an immovable property, had left behind his widow, Mrs. Leelawati Singh, and three sons, namely, Shri Ashok Singh. 5hri vijay Kumar Singh and Shri Vivek Kumar Singh. He died on the 25th of January, 1996. His widow, Mrs. Leelawati Singh is the first petitioner. Shri Ashok Single, the el dest son is the second petitioner. Shri Vijay Kumar Singh the second son is the second respondent. Shri Vivek Kumar Singh, the third son is the third respondent.

( 2 ) THE petitioner had prayed for the grant of Letters of Administration in respect of the estate of late Shri Harikishan Singh. The second petitioner supports the petition. The third petitioner, Vijay Kumar Singh. opposes the application for grant of Letters of Administration.

( 3 ) IN Annexure b to the petition the details about the immovable and movable assets left behind by the deceased Harikishan Singh, which are given as under :

( 4 ) THE liabilities mentioned in the petition are as under: Sh. Hari Krishan Singh had died leaving the following liabilities/expenses unprovided:

( 5 ) THE third respondent had given the details about the mov
































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top