SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 677

DEVENDER GUPTA, N.G.NANDI
GAGAN KISHORE SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Devinder Gupta, J.

( 1 ) IN this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner has sought quashing of FIR No. 212/98 registered with P. S. Chittranjan Park, South District, New Delhi dated 30. 5. 1998 for offence under Sections 420/34 Indian Penal Code, on the complaint of respondent No. 5.

( 2 ) THE main ground on which quashing is sought is that assuming all the allegations in the complaint to be true, the same does not disclose commission of any cognizable offence; the same at the most amounts to breach of contract. It could not give rise to a criminal prosecution and that too after a lapse of almost four years. Respondent No. 5 in connivance with the police has managed to get a civil wrong converted into a criminal one, which is nothing, but gross abuse of the process of law. As per the complainant s own showing, the goods were exported to the petitioner in March, 1995 against valid documents against part payment of the value of the goods. There was dispute with respect to quality of goods and late arrival thereof. As such, in October, 1995, the petitioner agreed to compensate the complainan























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top