SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(Del) 977

M.K.SHARMA
BESTOCHEM FORMULATIONS – Appellant
Versus
DINESH AYURVEDIC AGENCIES – Respondent


M. K. Sharma

( 1 ) THE present suit has been instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants seeking for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from passing ott of the trade mark of the plaintiff as also the copyright of the plaintiff and also for rendition ot accounts.

( 2 ) THE defendant No. 2 filed an application under Order 7, Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code praying for rejection of the plaint on various grounds raised in the application. One of the grounds taken in the said application is that the present suit is barred under Section 69 of the Partnership Act. The defendants have stated that on the date when the present suit was filed by the plaintiff, the plaintiff was an unregistered firm and since no suit could be instituted by a partnership firm linless the firm is registered and the person suing is shown in the Register of Finns as a partner in the firm, the suit is barred and, therefore, is liable to be dismissed on that count alone. It is, however, necessary to mention that apart from the aforesaid ground several other ground shave been raised by the defend ants in the a foresaid application seeking for rejection of the plaint.

( 3 ) HOWEVER, at the time of a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top