High Court Of Delhi
ALL INDIA LAWYERS UNION (DELHI UNIT) - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA - Respondent
Decided On : 11/12/1998
RIGHT TO LIFE - DRINKING WATER IN SCHOOLS - ARTICLE 21 - ARTICLE 39(F) - MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ACT, 1957 - DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION ACT, 1973 - DELHI SCHOOL EDUCATION RULES, 1973 - COMPENSATION FOR DEATH OF STUDENT DUE TO LACK OF DRINKING WATER IN SCHOOL - DUTY OF CARE - NEGLIGENCE - LIABILITY OF SCHOOL AUTHORITIES - AWARD OF COMPENSATION.
Fact of the Case:
A 7-year-old student, Anshu Sharma, died after being hit by a vehicle while crossing the road to fetch drinking water during school hours. The school authorities claimed that drinking water was available in the school, but the Commissioner's report found that the school lacked adequate water supply.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the school authorities were negligent in not providing adequate drinking water and security for the students, leading to the child's death. The court also found that the affidavits filed by the school authorities were false and misleading.
Issues: 1. Whether the school authorities were negligent in not providing adequate drinking water and security for the students? 2. Whether the affidavits filed by the school authorities were false and misleading? 3. Whether the parents of the deceased child are entitled to compensation?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the school authorities were negligent in not providing adequate drinking water and security for the students, leading to the child's death. The court relied on Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to life, and Article 39(f), which requires the State to secure opportunities and facilities for children to develop in a healthy manner. 2. The court found that the affidavits filed by the school authorities were false and misleading, as they contradicted the Commissioner's report and attempted to conceal the real reason why the child went outside the school during school hours. 3. The court held that the parents of the deceased child are entitled to compensation for the negligence of the school authorities.
Final Decision: The court directed the school authorities to pay Rs. 2 lakhs as compensation to the parents of the deceased child within four weeks. The court also directed that the erring officials be held accountable.
( 2 ) TO meet the allegations two counter-affidavits have been filed on behalf of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. These affidavits have been affirmed by Shri Om Prakash, Assistant Education Officer, Nazafgarh Zone, and Shri T. C. Arora, Deputy Education Officer. While not denying the accident and the fact that the child had gone outside the school during school hours, it is asserted that the drinking water was freely available in the school. The averments made in this regard in the affidavits filed on February 2, 1998 and September 1, 1998 by Shri Om Prakash and Shri T. C. Arora, respectively, are as follows :-
" It is submitted that there is no shortage of water in the school. Therefore, there was absolutely no question for the school children to go outside the School for drinking water. What is most important is the fact that there is neither any water tap nor any other source of drinking water near the school or on the highway as alleged in the petition. " (Affidavit of Shri Om Prakash)
" Contents of para 6 is (are) not denied to the extent that (a) school boy of seven years old was crushed to death by a four wheeler tempo on the fateful day i. e. 23. 12. 1997. Rest of the averments in this para are wrong and denied. It is submitted that there is no shortage of water in the school and therefore, there was absolutely no question for the school children to go outside the school for drinking water. . . . " (Affidavit of Shri T. C. Arora)
( 3 ) THE above averments in the counter-affidavits clearly contradict the note of the Commissioner dated January 28, 1998. A perusal of the note of the Commissioner reveals that the same is based on the preliminary enquiry report made by the Additional Director (Vigilance), M. C. D. , dated January 22, 1998. It appears from the note that the tragedy could have been averted if adequate drinking water facility was available in the school. The note in this regard reads as follows:- "6. Shri Chauhan has also admitted that he had started the process of providing adequate water supply to the school since June, 97 but till 23. 12. 97 no tangible progress in the same was made. It is understood that soon after the incident 2 hand pump had been made operative within a couple of days. Had this kind of promptness been shown earlier, the tragedy might have been averted. Accordingly, I do not find any reason as to why only written warning be given to Shri V. S. Chauhan, J. E. (Works ). RDA for major penalty be initiated against him as well as Head Master Shri Attar Singh Jain who showed utter lack of responsibility in discharge of his duties. "
( 4 ) THEREFORE, it is apparent that though the process for providing adequate water supply to the school was started in June 1997, no tangible progress was made in this direction till December 23, 1997. It was only after the incident that two hand pumps had been made operative. Thus, it is clear that an attempt has been made by the affiants to conceal the real reason why the child Anshu Sharma went outside the school on December 23, 1997 during school hours. We are constrained to observe that the affidavits filed by Shri Om Prakash, Assistant Education Officer and Shri T. C. Arora, Deputy Education Officer, have taken liberties with truth.
( 5 ) THE importance of provision of drinking water in a school cannot be over emphasised. Children cannot be expected to remain in school for long hours without water. They can not be made to go out side the school, o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.