SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 360

USHA MEHRA
SHRIMANI ARORA – Appellant
Versus
A. K. GARG – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHIMA GUPTA, I.S.MATHUR, R.K.AGARWAL, R.L.Kohli

Usha Mehra, J.

( 1 ) RESPONDENT/landlord filed a petition for eviction against the present petitioner on the ground of his bonafide requirement under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the Act ). It was respondent s case before the Additional Rent Controller that except the properly in question he had no other alternative suitable accommodation available to him. He has been forced by the circumstances to live in one room in his mother s house bearing No. D-7, N. D. S. E. Part-1, New Delhi. His family consisted of himself, his wife and one grown up daughter. It was not possible for all of them to sleep in one room. They per force have to sleep in the drawing room on. the floor. Thus the accommodation available at D-7, N. D. S. E. Part-1, New Delhi could not be called reasonably suitable alternative accommodation for his residence and for he residence of his family members dependent upon him for the purpose of residence. He had further pleaded that in house No. D-7, N. D. S. E. , Part-1, New Delhi there arc only two rooms besides drawing room, kitchen, toilet etc. Out of these two rooms, one room is in occupation of the mother and the other with his brother. H






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top