USHA MEHRA
SHRIMANI ARORA – Appellant
Versus
A. K. GARG – Respondent
( 1 ) RESPONDENT/landlord filed a petition for eviction against the present petitioner on the ground of his bonafide requirement under Section 14 (1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (in short the Act ). It was respondent s case before the Additional Rent Controller that except the properly in question he had no other alternative suitable accommodation available to him. He has been forced by the circumstances to live in one room in his mother s house bearing No. D-7, N. D. S. E. Part-1, New Delhi. His family consisted of himself, his wife and one grown up daughter. It was not possible for all of them to sleep in one room. They per force have to sleep in the drawing room on. the floor. Thus the accommodation available at D-7, N. D. S. E. Part-1, New Delhi could not be called reasonably suitable alternative accommodation for his residence and for he residence of his family members dependent upon him for the purpose of residence. He had further pleaded that in house No. D-7, N. D. S. E. , Part-1, New Delhi there arc only two rooms besides drawing room, kitchen, toilet etc. Out of these two rooms, one room is in occupation of the mother and the other with his brother. H
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.