SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 359

K.S.GUPTA
KANWAR PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SURAT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKUL ROHTAGI, N.S.VASHISHT, RAVI GUPTA

K. S. Gupta

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff-appellant is directed against the order dated January 3, 1996, of a learned Single Judge dismissing I. As. No. 6035/ 93 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and Order XL Rule 1 read with Section 151, CPC and I. A. No. 4580/95 moved under Order XL Rule I and Section 151, Civil Procedure Code in Suit No. 1413/93.

( 2 ) THE suit out of which the present appeal arises was filed inter alia, on the allegations that defendant-respondent No. 1 is the father of the appeallant and defendants-respondents 2-4 and they constituted a Hindu undivided family. HUF owns and possesses ancestral properties mentioned in the schedule annexed to the plaint and the appellant and the respondents have l/5th share each therein. Amongst the ancestral properties is the land comprised in Khasra No. 102/2, measuring 1 bigha at Raj Pur Chhawani, Delhi. It is alleged that in the first instance appellant took agency of Burmashell (lateranmed as Bharat Petroleum) and started running a petrol pump on that land. Later on, respondent No. 1 joined the appellant. After some time resondent No. 1 dropped the appellant and joined respondent No. 2 in the business. Later on, resp














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top