K.S.GUPTA
KANWAR PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SURAT SINGH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal by the plaintiff-appellant is directed against the order dated January 3, 1996, of a learned Single Judge dismissing I. As. No. 6035/ 93 filed under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 and Order XL Rule 1 read with Section 151, CPC and I. A. No. 4580/95 moved under Order XL Rule I and Section 151, Civil Procedure Code in Suit No. 1413/93.
( 2 ) THE suit out of which the present appeal arises was filed inter alia, on the allegations that defendant-respondent No. 1 is the father of the appeallant and defendants-respondents 2-4 and they constituted a Hindu undivided family. HUF owns and possesses ancestral properties mentioned in the schedule annexed to the plaint and the appellant and the respondents have l/5th share each therein. Amongst the ancestral properties is the land comprised in Khasra No. 102/2, measuring 1 bigha at Raj Pur Chhawani, Delhi. It is alleged that in the first instance appellant took agency of Burmashell (lateranmed as Bharat Petroleum) and started running a petrol pump on that land. Later on, respondent No. 1 joined the appellant. After some time resondent No. 1 dropped the appellant and joined respondent No. 2 in the business. Later on, resp
Relied on : T. Krishnaswamy Chetty v. C. Thangavelu Chetty and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.