SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 395

DEVENDER GUPTA, K.S.GUPTA
SANJAY TANDON – Appellant
Versus
SARABJIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.OBEROI, M.S.Vohra, MUKUL ROHTAGI, S.N.KUMAR, VINOD SRIVASTAVA

K. S. Gupta, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by Sanjay Tandon, plaintiff-appellant, is directed against the order dated November 21, 1996 of learned Single Judge whereby No. 879/96 filed by him under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code was dismissed.

( 2 ) SUIT has been filed by the appellant, inter alia, alleging that Sarabjit Singh, defendant respondent No. 1, is the owner of the property bearing No. A-196, Defence Colony, New Delhi and he was interested to dispose of the property. As respondent No. 1 is residing in USA, by executing a Special Power of Attorney dated September 30, 1995, he appointed Bhupinder Singh defendant-respondent No. 2, as his attorney. It is alleged that respondent No. 2 entered into an agreement to sell dated October 25, 1995, with the appellant. Under this agreement to sell the aforesaid property A-196 was agreed to be sold for a consideration of Rs. 45 lacs, out of which a sum of Rs. 5 lacs was paid by the appellant as earnest money through Pay Order No. 186395 dated October 24, 1995, in favour of respondent No. 1 which was duly encashed by him. It is further alleged that towards the balance sale consideration Rs. 17,50,000. 00 wer















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top