SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 390

K.MEHRA
NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
BHUPINDER SINGH CHAUDHRY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ATUL SRIDHARAN, GOPAL SUBRAMANIUM

J. K. Mehra, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) IN this petitioner and in the connected Revision No. 164/97, National Capital Territory of Delhi and Central Bureau of Investigation respectively have challenged the same order passed by the Special Judge in C. C. No. 91/96 dated 7. 12. 1996 quashing criminal proceedings against the respondent in RC 16 (A)/92-DLI under Sections 120b, 409 Indian Penal Code and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

( 2 ) IN brief, the facts of the case are as under:- The respondent who is a member of Delhi Higher Judicial Service held the post of Secretary, Law and Judicial, National Capital Territory of Delhi till 28. 2. 1990 and was also appointed, inter-alia, as Administrator General under Section 3 of the Administrator General Act, 1963. The Deputy Administrator General was supposed to assist the Administrator General. After affording repeated opportunities to Mr. Kazim Ali Khan for handing over the charge, he failed to hand over the charge and consequently, a case bearing RC 16 (A)/92-DLI dated 31. 3. 1992 under Sections 120b, 409 Indian Penal Code and 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 198


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top