SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 649

A.K.SRIVASTAVA, Y.K.SABHARWAL
UTPAL MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
NICELAI CHRISTENSEN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K.Santoshi, S.L.SETHI, SANJIV KUMAR

Y. K. Sabharwal, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent, a Danish national, was intercepted at Airport by the Customs officer while he was leaving for Copenhagen on 22nd May 1996. The search of his luggage resulted in recovery of 975 grams of hashish. A complaint was filed by Customs Department through its Air Customs Officer Mr. Utpal Mishra Praying that the accused be tried and punished in accordance with law. The accused was charged for offences under Sections 21 and 23 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short `the Act ) for being in illegal and unlawful possession of 975 grams of hashish which he attempted to unsuccessfully export out of the country.

( 2 ) BY the impugned judgment the trial Court acquitted the respondent-accused mainly on the ground of non compliance of Section 42 of the Act holding that the non compliance of the said provision vitiates the prosecution. All other contentions urged on behalf of the accused were rejected by the trial Court. The Customs Department is in appeal before us.

( 3 ) RELYING upon a decision of a learned single Judge of this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 149/96 entitled Shri Richard Thomas Wrigley Vs. Customs and another decided


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top