SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 693

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY, DEVENDER GUPTA
GAURAV ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Malvika Kumar, V.K.Makhija, Vandana Khurana

Devinder Gupta, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is seeking direction against the respondent to withdraw letter (annexure-P) dated 13. 10. 1995 with further direction to allot to it C. S. C. Plot No. 6, Sector 15, Rohini, New Delhi at the auction rate i. e. taking the bid amount divided by the area of the plot announced at the time of auction.

( 2 ) THE admitted facts are that in July, 1994, the respondent announced the auction of Convenient Shopping Centre Site No. 6, Sector 15, Rohini, New Delhi measuring 1285. 51 sq. mts. , which was to take place on 26. 8. 194 at 11. 30 a. m. at D. D. A. Auction Hall, Vikas Sadan, I. N. A. Market, New Delhi. The user prescribed was shop-cum- office. The auction took place on the specified date as per the terms and conditions of auction annexure-B. The petitioner was declared the highest bidder at a premium of Rs. 24,35,000. 00. Clause 2 (vii) of the terms and conditions of auction inter alia provide that the size of the plot announced by the respondent was only approximate; and the highest bidder shall have to accept variation upto 15% either way in the area of the plot subject to the payment or refund as the case may be of the amount of premium, for su














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top