SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 687

High Court Of Delhi
DIPAK KUMAR SINGH - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA - Respondent
Civil 3683 of 1995
Decided On : 08/22/1997

Advocates Appeared:
B.BABBAR, N.Kinara

Headnote:It was ruled that denial of disability pension despite the recommendation of medical board is arbitrary, as the disability had occurred during the course of service due to improper administration of vaccine

Devinder Gupta, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has sought the quashing of order of discharge dated 3. 12. 1993 with direction to the respondents to reinstate him with full back wages and all consequential benefits. In the alternative, the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to award disability medical pension to him

( 2 ) THE petitioner was enrolled in the Indian Air Force on 22. 3. 1991 as Airman in the Trade - photo Technician . According to the petitioner, a board of Medical Officers, which conducted medical examination before his entry to the Air Force declared him fit in all respects and made no note of any disease or disability in the documents of his enrolment. In November, 1992, the petitioner completed initial training and was qualified as Aircraftsman and was posted in No. 2 Sqn. Air Force. In May, 1993 he was sent on posting to E and I. T. I. , Jalahalli East, Bangalore for conversion course from Photo Technician to Photo Filter Trade. It is further stated that on 23. 7. 1993 routine vaccines of TAB and Cholera administered to the petitioner at Station Sick Quarters, Jalahalli East, Bangalore. Such vaccines are administered in routine medical course. The petitioner developed fever and headache and frequent urination whereafter he started feeling weakness. On 2. 8. 1993 the petitioner s blood and sugar tests were conducted, which revealed that his urine had sugar contents. In Station Sick Quarters, he was given Glucose Saline without pre- diabetic precautions, which caused Diabetic KETO ACIDOSIC and the petitioner went in Coma. He was sent to Command Hospital A. F. Bangalore and was kept there for three months under treatment. As a result of further medical check up, the petitioner was declared a patient of Diabetic Mellitus (IDDM) 250 and was placed in Category EEE (Permanent) with 40% disability. Relying upon the medical opinion, the petitioner was invalided out of service. His claim for medical pension was also turned down by the Controller of Defence Accounts (P) Allahabad. Appeal was also preferred but of no avail.

( 3 ) THE petitioner has challenged the order of discharge and non-grant of disability pension on the ground that discharge is illegal, unwarranted and is in violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India. Before enrollment, he was examined by a Board of Doctors, who had declared him fit. He became a victim of wrong treatment given at Station Sick Quarters and Command Hospital, Bangalore. Opinion of Medical Board at Command Hospital is wrong and is based upon wrong diagnosis. Because of the opinion of the Medical Board he was invalided out. The discharge based upon such wrong medical opinion is illegal. Though the percentage of disability was found to be 40% for 2 years, yet CCD (P), Allahabad, in an arbitrary manner, took a decision not to grant medical pension.

( 4 ) THE respondents in reply filed on the affidavit of Group Captain V. Pradhan, Oficer-in- Charge, Legal Cell, Air Force Record Office, New Delhi have stated that the petitioner was discharged from service on being found unfit for further service in Air Force being a case Diabetes Mellitue (IDDM) 250. The Medical Board recommended 40% disability for two years at the time of discharge. He had put in a total of two years and 255 days. The case for grant of disability pension was taken up with the Chief Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), Allahabad for adjudication of disability pension. Through letter dated 16. 11. 1994 a decision was taken by CCDA (P) Allahabad that the petitioner s disability, from which he suffered during service, is neither attributable to, nor aggravated by Air Force Service. As such the claim for disability pension was rejected. Decision was conveyed to the petitioner through letter dated 13. 12. 1994 with an advise to prefer an appeal but no appeal was preferred. On rejection of disability pension, the petitioner was granted invalid gratuity of Rs. 3,000. 00









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top