MANMOHAN SARIN, MUKUL MUDGAL
CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION – Appellant
Versus
MANISHA SURANA – Respondent
( 1 ) ADMIT. Two Letter Patent Appeals bearing Nos. 194/96 and 201/96. have been preferred TO against the judgment dated 2. 8. 1996 of the learned Single Judge in the Civil Writ Petition No. 2545/96 titled Manisha Surana Vs. Central Board of Secondary Education and Another. LPA. 194/96 has been preferred TO by the Central Board of Secondary Education (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the "board ) . While LPA. 201/96 has been preferred TO by the Manipal Academy of Higher Education (hereinafter REFERRED TO to as the manipal Academy" ). This common judgment would dispose of both the appeals,
( 2 ) RESPONDENT No. l. Manisha Surana had appeared for the Under Graduate Entrance Test (UGET) concluded lor a seal in the Medical and Dental Colleges Unfortunaley Manisha Surana omitted to fill in the test booklet code in her answer sheet, as a result. Of which the Board declined to evaluate her answer sheet She filed Civil Writ Petition No. 2545/96 seeking directions for the Board to evaluate her answer sheet after putting the test booklet code and to declare her result alongwith the other successful candidates. A further direction was sought for grant of admission in the Manipal Aca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.