SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 194

B.GOEL
BHARAT ELECTRICALS – Appellant
Versus
STANDING CONFERENCE OF PUBLIC ENTERPRISES – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.C.SETH, R.L.PAL

J. B. Goel,j.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Reconciliation Act, 1996 (for short the Act) Filed by the petitioner/contractor to restrain the respondent from encashing the bank guarantees No. 317/92 to 326/92 and 451/92 to 458/92 issued by Canara Bank, Janpath, New Delhi on behalf of the petitioner which are sought to be invoked by the respondent, beneficiary in their letters dated 20. 12. 1996/23. 12. 1996.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are that the respondent is a Society which was setting up an office complex for Public Sector undertakings at Laxmi Nagar District Centre, Delhi. The petitioner was awarded a contract for excution of the work of Internal electrification and Sub Station work at the said Complex. The contract between the parties was executed on 28. 10. 1988. The total value of the work was Rs. 6,85,62,217. 70. The work was to be completed within a period of 20 months, i. e. , by the end of June, 1990. The work was delayed and could not becompleted within the stipulated period. Only the work of the value of Rs. 7. 30 Lacs could be executed. A supplementary agreement was also executed on 20. 3. 1991 between the parties.

( 3 ) IT appears that t









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top