SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 155

MOHD.SHAMIM
MOHAMMAD AFZAL – Appellant
Versus
NOOR NISHA BEGUM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S.GAUR, M.G.Dhingra, MUKTA GUPTA

Mohd. Sharnim,j.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the judgment and order dated 9th February, 1996 passed by Mr. R. K. Sharma, Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi whereby he set aside the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate dismissing the complaint filed by the respondent herein under sections 323/452 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 2 ) BRIEF facts which led to the present revision petition are as under : that on Mst. Noor Nisha Begum Filed a complaint before the Metropolitan Magistrate, P. S. Lahori Gate under sections 452/448/506/463/465/120-B of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Magistrate after the appraisal of the evidence led by the complaint came to the conclusion that the alleged incident never took place and the complaint itself was a Figment of the imagination of the complainant. He was-further of the view that the complaint was Filed in order to bring pressure on the respondents. Hence the said complaint was dismissed vide judgment and order dated 28th October, 1995.

( 3 ) AGGRIEVED and dis-satisfied with the said judgment and order the complainant i. e. the respondent herein approached the court of Session by way of revision. The learned Additio















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top