SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 212

M.K.SHARMA
SURESH CHANDER – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.SALVAN, INDERJIT SIDDHU, SANJAY PODDAR

M. K. Sharma

( 1 ) DISPUTES having arisen between the parties in respect of the contract entered into between the petitioner and the respondent No. 1 for execution of the work of construction of 300 Janta houses in connection with internal development in Trans Yamuna area in Zone No. 2, the same were referred to the respondent No. 2 for adjudication in terms of the arbitration clause. The respondent No. 2 entered upon the reference and after hearing the parties and receiving the statement of claims and reply thereto and evidence produced by the parties on record, passed an award in respect of the aforesaid disputes on 29th December, 1993. The notice of the award was stated to have been received by the petitioner on or about 30. 12. 1993.

( 2 ) THE petitioner thereafter filed the petition in this Court under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act for directing the respondent No. 2 to file the award in the Court with records of the arbitration proceedings. This Court issued notice to the Arbitrator on the said petition and upon service of such notice, the Arbitrator filed the award along with the records of the arbitration proceedings in this Court. Notice having been issued to the respond















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top