SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 45

JASPAL SINGH
SHIKHA DEVELOPERS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
AJAY SUBA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.N.PAREKH, J.R.MIDHA, N.B.Khatinoda, PUNAM, Rajnish Ranjan, SHANTI BHUSHAN, SUSHIL JAIN

Jaspal Singh, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) MS. Shikha Developers Ltd. had filed a suit for possession and recovery of mesne profits. In the said suit an order was passed directing M/s. M. S. Associates to deposit arrears of rent. Aggrieved by the said order a Civil Revision was filed. It was No. 744 of 1995. On October 26, 1995 the said revision petition was disposed of with an order that out of the arrears of rent Rs. 10 Lakhs would be paid by 9th of November, 1995 and the remaining amount would be paid in monthly instalments of Rs. 1,50,000. 00 commencing from 10th of each succeeding month. It appears that it was a consent order and the tenant was directed to file an undertaking in terms of the order referred to above.

( 2 ) THE grievance of M/s. Shikha Developers Ltd. is that the said order was not complied with wilfully and contumaciously and that consequently civil contempt was committed. Hence, this CCP. No. 35/96.

( 3 ) IT is not disputed before me that the consent order as referred to above was passed and that though in terms of that order M/s. M. S. Associates was required to pay Rs. 10 Lacs by 9th of November, 1995 and remaining amount in monthly instalments of Rs. 1,50,000. 00 each, t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top