SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 101

M.JAGANNADHA RAO, MANMOHAN SARIN
RAVI KANT – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAJIV BEHL, S.K.AGRAWAL, S.K.Gupta, S.N.KUMAR

M. Jagannadha Rao, J.

( 1 ) THE Ist petitioner is Mr. Ravi Kant and his wife is the 2nd petitioner, they seek issue of a Writ of Certiorari quashing the orders of the National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (herein called the "national Commission") dated 8. 12. 1995 in First Appeal No. 666 of 1993 and the orders of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter called the "state Commission") dated 15. 10. 1993 in 4 cases viz. Case Nos. C-242, C-243, C-255 of 1992 and C-82 of 1993.

( 2 ) BY orders dated 15. 10. 1993 passed under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter called "the Act"), the State Commission imposed a sentence of 1 year simple imprisonment on the 1st petitioner and a fine of Rs. 5,000. 00 in each of the 4 cases (or in default, simple imprisonment of 3 months ). The 2nd petitioner being a lady was directed to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000. 00 in the Case No. C-243 of 1992. The abovesaid order was confirmed by the National Commission on 8. 12. 1995.

( 3 ) THE petitioners floated two companies, one in 1987 called the Instant Growth Funds (Pvt.) Ltd and the other in 1989 called the I. G. F. Leasing (Pvt. ). Th





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top