SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 550

MAHINDER NARAIN, S.K.MAHAJAN
APPAREL EXPORT PROMOTION COUNCIL – Appellant
Versus
A. K. CHOPRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.M.SANGHVI, A.P.Dhamija, ASHOK MATHUR, RISHIKESH

Mahinder Narain, J. (Oral)

( 1 ) THESE matters can be disposed of at the show cause stage.

( 2 )

( 3 ) THE allegations which had been made in this case, were that A. K. Chopra, P. S. to Chairman. APEC had tried to assault Miss Suchitra Vishnoi, Clerk-Cum-Typst physically. This assault is alleged to have taken place in Taj Palace Hotel. The allegation was that Miss Suchitra Vishnoi was taken to a room on the pretext of taking dictation from the Chairman of the Apparel Export Promotion Council.

( 4 ) WE have been taken in detail through the evidence/deposition of Miss Suchitra Vishnoi. No part of that evidence discloses that A. K. Chopra even managed to make the slightest physical contact with the lady. The entire deposition relates that A. K. Chopra tried to touch her. As we have said that no attempts made, allegedly by A. K. Chopra, succeeded in making physical contact with Miss Suchitra Vishnoi, even it the narrow confines of a Hotel "lift".

( 5 ) TO our mind, on such evidence as that was produced before the Enquiry Officer, it is not even possible to come to a conclusion that there is an "attempt to molest" as there have been no physical contact. There being no physical contact be


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top