SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 305

R.C.LAHOTI
MOHAN OIL AND SOAP MILLS – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMARJIT SINGH, LALIT TALVAR

R. C. Lahoti,j.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal under Section 109 (2) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 feeling aggrieved by order dated 22nd August, 1979 passed by the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, Delhi rejecting the petitioners application for registration of a trade mark in terms of Section 18 (4) of the Act.

( 2 ) ON 5th December, 1974, the petitioners filed an application to register a trade mark consisting of words neelam SOAP in Class 3 in respect of washing soaps. The mark was subsequently confined to the word NEELAM. The application was objected to by the Registry on the ground that the mark applied for was laudatory of the goods and therefore it did not qualify for registration under Section 9 of the Act. The petitioner submitted and produced expert evidence in support of his submission that NEELAM means a precious stone and it has no reference to blue colour The petitioner had sought for registration in Part-A of the Register but at the hearing before Registrar it was submitted that the application could be considered for registration in Part-B. The Registrar has held that the meaning of the word NEELAM is blue in Tamil language. Washing soap can be blue in co









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top