SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 412

JASPAL SINGH
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Appellant
Versus
RAJENDRA PARSAD – Respondent


JASPAL SINGH

( 1 ) THE learned Civil Judge framed a preliminary issue with regard to jurisdiction of the civil court and dismissed the suit holding that the matter related to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Labour Court under the Industrial Disputes Act However the view so taken did not find favour with the learned Additional District Judge He thus accepted the appeal Dissatisfaction with the order of the 1st Appellate Court has led to this Appeal

( 2 ) THE facts are not taxing The respondent who claims to be a regular employee of the Delhi Development Authority has been transferred to the employment of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi. He says the DDA could not do it because of his service conditions and that,in any case,the order affects adversely his seniority and chances of promotion Hence his spit for declaration that he could not be so transferred and for injunction restraining the DDA from implementing the order.

( 3 ) IN response to the suit though the Municipal Corporation preferred to-stay away from the proceedings, the DDA filed its written statement consting the suit on various grounds However, what need to be emphasised is that in the pleadings it was no where alleg




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top