SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 Supreme(Del) 407

S.K.MAHAJAN
REVLON INC. – Appellant
Versus
SARITA MANUFACTURING COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, HEMANT SINGH, MANMOHAN SINGH, MUKUL ROHTAGI, R.K.Anand, VIVEK DHOLAKIA

S. K. Mahajan

( 1 ) THE plaintiffs claiming themselves to be the owners of the trade marks "revlon", "charlie" and "intimate" for cosmetics, perfumery, essential oils, hair and toiletries, etc. , have filed this suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from in any manner manufacturing and selling the perfumes, toiletries, etc. or any other product bearing the aforesaid trade marks or any other mark deceptively similar to the same. Certain other reliefs have also been claimed in the suit. The facts in short relevant for decision of this application are:

( 2 ) THAT the plaintiffs have alleged to have coined the trade mark "revlon" using the same as the key portion of their trading style and got it registered for various goods in the United States of America and many other countries of the world. Plaintiff states that it deals in cosmetics, perfumery and toiletries, etc. which are mostly used by ladies. In the year 1963, they opened the Revlon Research Centre in New York with highly qualified and scientific staff which today has more than 110 physicians, chemists and other technicians. This was done due to their dedication towards advanced research in the cosmetic indust

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top