M.K.SHARMA
MAYUR SYNTEX LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB AND SIND BANK – Respondent
( 1 ) A very important and vital question has been raised in these petitions which requires immediate attention of this Court. The question raised is as to whether on conning into force of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993, in short "debt Recovery Act", setting up Debt Recovery Tribunals, "tribunal" in short, for adjudicating upon the claims of the banks and financial institutions, the jurisdiction of the Company Court under Subsection 1) of Section 446 of the Companies Act to grant or refuse leave of any suit or legal proceedings and under Sub-section (3) of Section 446 of the Companies Act to transfer the suits or any proceedings to the Company Court has been taken away and that the said banks and the financial institutions need not apply for such leave either for filing new claims or proceeding with a pending claim, although the Company has gone into liquidation and has been wound up by the Company Court.
( 2 ) I have heard Mr. Sumant Batra, Mr. A. S. Chandoik, Mr. P. C. Khanna, Mr. Manmohan, Mr. B. N. Nayar, Mr. Rajiv Datta and other Counsels appearing for the various parties and record appreciation of their painstaking effo
REFERRED TO : Sudarsan Chits (I) Ltd. V. G.Sukumaran Pillai and Others
Central Bank of India V. Elmot Engineering Company
UCO Bank Vs. The Official Liquidator High Court, Bombay and another
Sarwan Singh v. Kasturi Lal and Others
Ashoka Marketing Ltd. and Another v. Punjab National Bank Others
Union of India and Another v. India Fishers Pvt. Ltd.
Life Insurance Corporation of India v. D.J. Bahadur
Basti Sugar Mills v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.