USHA MEHRA
S. P. AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR DELHI – Respondent
( 1 ) VERY interesting points have been raised in this writ petition, namely, (1) whether on account of Section 511-B (2) (i) of D. M. C. Act, on the issuing of notification dated 24th February,1997 the petitioner who was working as Additional General Manager automatically acquired the status of Member, Delhi Vidyut Board (In short the Board); (2) whether on account of the notification dated 24th February,1997 issued under Section 5 of the Electricity (Supply) Act,1948 (hereinafter called the Act) the post of Additional General Manager in fact was re-designated as Member Board; (3) whether the right which accrued to the petitioner on account of the notification dated 24th February,1997 could not be taken away retrospectively by a subsequent notification of 27th February,1997; (4) whether after redesignation of the post as Member Board there does not exist any post of AGM; (5) whether in the absence of any specific letter of appointment issued in favour of the petitioner he cannot claim the post of Member Board; and finally (6) whether the petitioner in this writ petition has claimed declaration or mandamus for appointment to the post of Member Board which is not perm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.