S.N.KAPUR
KEDAR NATH GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
J. K. ORGANISATION – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS CM (M) 69/77 takes exception to an order rejecting the application No. 2568/75 for registration of trade mark consisting of the words jay KAY in class 6 in respect of locks, rolled and cast building materials, bolts, nuts, screws, door hinges and nails for sale in the States of Uttar Pradesh, Mysore, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu.
( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner Kedar Nath Gupta, the mark jay KAY is being used by him since 1965. It is claimed that since 1948, the applicant was working under the name and style J. K. Varshneyandco. He adopted the trade name jay KAY after his trading style jay Kay and Company for his manufactured locks by adopting the initials of his father and his own name for the customers and dealers in South India made clerical mistakes in the cheques in mis-spelling and word varshney in the year 1965. He claims to have following sale turnover of his goods under the trade mark jay KAY :
THE appellant moved this application tor registration, accordingly on 19. 5. 1969.
( 3 ) AFTER the trade name was advertised in the Trade Marks Journal No. 552 dated 1st June, 1972, JK Organization, an association registered under the Indian T
REFERRED TO : P.N. Mayor v. Registrar of Trade Marks
Warnink v. Townend, Reckitt Colman Products Ltd. v.Borden Inc.
Dalip Chand Aggarwal and 0rs. v. M/s. Escorts Ltd.
M/s. Escorts Ltd. v. Surinder Nath and Ors.
M/s. Fatima Tile Works and etc. v. M/s. Sutlarsan Trading Company Ltd. and Am.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.