ARUN B.SAHARYA, S.N.KAPUR
RAMSONS SOUTHEND – Appellant
Versus
DIVISIONAL MANAGER, NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED: – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Regular First Appeal is directed against judgment anddecree dismissing suit for recovery of Rs. 64,900. 00 for loss occasioned on account ofburglary. The suit has been dismissed solely on the finding on the issue: "whetherthe suit is barred by time?" in affirmative.
( 2 ) THE plaintiff/appellant, a registered partnership firm, is an authoriseddealer of M/s. Raymond s Woolen Mills Ltd. , having their showroom at C- 1/agreen Park Extension. It had procured multi-peril insurance policy No. 7512100791for the period 8. 11. 82 to 8. 11. 83 from the defendants/respondents in the sum of Rs. 2 lakhs to cover losses on account of (a) fire, lightening; (b) riot and strike; or (c) theftor any attempt thereof. According to the appellant, there was a burglary or theft inthe evening of 16. 4. 83 at about 5. 15 p. m. at the above said shop of the plaintiff. Theburglars/culprits opened the door of the shop violently and forcibly and threatenedthe employees and customers of the plaintiff of dire consequences in case anybodymoves from his place. They were carrying revolver and knives and few had coveredtheir faces with clothes. They even beat the employee and customers. After t
REFERRED TO : Rajender Kumar Arya v. M/s. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Food Corporation of India v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Ors.
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sujir Ganesh Nayak and Co.
Valcan insurance Co. v. Maharaj Singh
Food Corporation of India v. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.