( 1 ) THIS is a petition filed by the petitioner, who at present is employed with the respondent No. 1 as Reader and has impugned the selection to the Office of Principal -Incharge of evening college mainly on the ground that the Selection Committee, which had interviewed all the candidates and selected the present incumbent of that office, was not properly constituted inasmuch as the Member Secretary, i. e. ; the Principal Mr. Ratnakar Pandcy was not qualified to be there as on the material date had already been nominated a Member of Rajya Sabha of Parliament. University Grants. Commission (UGC) had recommended which was accepted by Delhi University, that a teacher of a college who is elected or nominated to the Parliament should not hold any administrative position in the college during, the period they are members of Parliament.

( 2 ) THE relevant extract of Resolution No. 638 is reproduced below:-

"the University Grants Commission had referred this question earlier to its Advisory Committee of Vice-Chancellors and the commission after considering the advice of the Committee of Vice-Chancellors had expressed the view that "the teachers who are either elected or no