SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 654

J.K.MEHRA
S. MOHINDER PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UTTAM KAUR PURI – Respondent


J. K. Mehra

( 1 ) THE petitioner has paid in the Court today a sum of Rs. 15,000. 00 towards arrears of rent which has been accepted by the respondent without prejudice to her rights regarding balance, if any. Counsel for the petitioner to file details of the payments made from February 1993 till date, within one week.

( 2 ) I have heard the petitioner s Counsel. His main contention is that the special procedure for service prescribed under Section 25-B of Rent Control Act has not been followed and there was no personal service on the petitioner. I have perused the record. I find that on two occasions, summons were issued in strict compliance of the procedure laid down under Section 25-B of Rent Control Act. Summons issued under registered A. D. post were taken to the petitioner s address. The cover was taken to the address on 28. 3. 1993, 29. 3. 1993, 30. 3. 1993, 31. 3. 1993, 2. 4. 1993, 3. 4. 1993 and 6. 4. 1993 and was returned with the postal remarks "bar bar jane par evam suchna dene parbhi praptkartaghar par nahin milta ". The summons issued by ordinary process were returned with the following report of the process server to the effect that brother and mother of the petitione


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top