DEVENDER GUPTA, M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
PREM PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
AIR INDIA CORPORATION – Respondent
( 1 ). Petitioner has in this writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prayed for quashing of communications annexure F dated 10. 2. 1993 and subsequent communications dated 26. 2. 1993 and 26. 3. 1993 (Annexure K ). In nutshell the petitioner s grievance is against the action of the respondent in declining to act on the withdrawal of petitioner s resignation which according to the petitioner had been conveyed to the respondent before acceptance of the resignation. Petitioner s case is that resignation was tendered to an incompetent authority and it was not a valid resignation and in any case its acceptance, irrespective of its withdrawal on 10. 2. 1993, was by an incompetent authority and as such the same is non-est.
( 2 ). Facts in brief are that the petitioner, a permanent and confirmed employee of Air India and posted as Traffic Assistant at Delhi, on 3. 2. 1993 submitted his resignation with immediate effect bysending a telegram annexure B addressed to the Manager- Northern India, Air India, Himalaya House, New Delhi. It was followed by a letter dated 8. 2. 1993 (annexure C), which affirmed the tendering of resignation from the service of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.