SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 982

USHA MEHRA
INDIRA KHURANA – Appellant
Versus
PREM PRAKASH – Respondent


Usha Mehra, J.

( 1 ) MRS. INDIRA Khurana was married to resondent Mr. Prem Prakash. From this wedlock they have been blessed with two daughters. Relations between the parties became strained as a result the petitioner filed a petition for dissolution of marriage on the ground of cruelty and desertion. This petition was listed as HMA. No. 338/94. During the pendency of that petition, respondent filed an application under Section 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act. He sought custody of the children for two hours every day and also for certain days. He further sought the custody for a period of three weeks commencing from 10th June,1994 or in the alternative their custody so that they could tour to the Western India including Bombay and Goa besides claiming other relief and visitation rights. He also filed a Habeas Corpus petition in the High Court. However, after talking to the children this Court did not grant the relief, in the meantime, his petition became infructuous. He accordingly withdrew his Habeas Corpus petition. The present petitioner filed a petition under Section 7 read with Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act,1890 (in short the Act) for her being appointed as guardian o




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top