M.S.A.SIDDIQUI, MAHINDER NARAIN
GURDIP SINGH UBAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioners Gurdip Singh, Mrs. Har Sharan Mishra and Mrs. Har Kiran have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution on. 23-4-1986, praying that the notifications for acquisition issued for planned development of Delhi under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act (hereinafter called as "the Act"), being dated 25-11-1980 and 7-6-1985 respectively, in relation to the land of the petitioners in village Chhatarpur in the Union Territory of Delhi, be quashed.
( 2 ) THE petitioners asserted that they are the owners and in possession of land in khasra No. 70411, 706j2, 70611, 706,3, 70712, 714, 71512, 90912, 1012 and 693, all situated in the revenge estate of village, Chhatarpur in the Union Territory of Delhi. It was also asserted that the aforesaid lands are allotted to Major General Sujan Singh Uban in lieu of agriculture lands left behind in. West Pakistan. It was further asserted that this land was allotted to Major General Sujan Singh Uban by Sanad dated 27-9-1963. The petitioners became owners of the land as a result of an arbitration award of Shri Ram Singh Uban.
( 3 ) THE aforesaid notification under Section 4 of the Act, dated
REFERRED TO : Balak Ram Gupta v. U.O.I.
Shyam Nandan Prasad and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors.
Ashwani Kr. Dhingra Vs. State of Punjab
Farid Ahmed Abdul Samad and Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of the city of Ahmedabad and Anr.
State of Tamil Nadu and Ors. v. Krishnan and Ors.
Rambhai Lakhabai Bhakt v. State of Gujarat and Ors.
Indian, Express Newspapers (Bombay) P. Ltd., v. U.O.I. and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.