SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 973

M.K.SHARMA
CLASSIC MOTORS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MARUTI UDYOG LIMITED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ARUN JAITLEY, K.C.Kalra, MADAN BHATIA, Navin Chawla, R.J.C.AGGARWAL

M. K. SHARMA

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under section 20 of the Arbitration Act filed by the petitioner against the respondents seeking for an order to the respondents to file the agreement dated 15. 1. 1988 as modified by communication dated 23. 2. 1988 and on filing of the said agreement the disputes/ Differences arising between the parties out of the said agreement and enumerated in the petition be referred to arbitration in terms of arbitration clause No. 36 contained in the said agreement

( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed as a dealer by the respondent No. 1 and a dealership agreement dated 15. 1. 1988 was executed between the parties. The said dealership agreement contained an arbitration clause being clause No. 36 wherein it is stated that if any dispute and difference arises between the parties as to the construction or true intent and meaning of any of the terms and conditions contained in the agreement or as to any payment to be made in pursuance thereof or to any other matter arising out of or in connection therewith or incidental thereto such differences or Disputes shall be referred to the Tribunal of Arbitration of Indian Chambers of Commerce, Delhi.

( 3 ) THE petitioner





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top