SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 159

JASPAL SINGH
JAI CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF DELHI – Respondent


Jaspal Singh,j.

( 1 ) ON April 15, 1991 at about 9. 45 p. m. the Operation Theatre of the Guru Nanak Eye Centre was a mute witness to an unfortunate incident involving Kumari Kiran Sharma and the present appellant Jai Chand. They were no strangers to each other. Whereas Kumari Kiran Sharma was employed in the said Centre as a Staff Nurse, Jai Chand was working there as a Nursing Orderly. This is how the prosecution witnesses unfold the events.

( 2 ) KUMARI Kiran Sharma was on duty from 9 p. m. to 7. 30 a. m. in the Operation Theatre. Jai Chand too was on duty on that very day. His duty hours were from 8 p. m. to 7. 30 a. m. At about 9. 45 p. m. after Ms. Sharma had finished her routine work she came to the Post Operation room of the Theatre. Jai Chand also arrived there and after catching hold of her, forcibly laid her down on the bed, broke the string of her Pyjama, gave aooth bite on her left cheek and tomed her underwear. He even removed her sanitary pad. Ms. Sharma, however , did not give up. After giving him a push, she ran to the "reception" at the first floor of the building where she narrated the incident to Sister A. Mathew (Public Witness -2 ). Later Dr. A. K. Gupta, Head












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top