SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Del) 162

B.K.RAMAMOORTHY
PUNJAB AND SINDH BANK – Appellant
Versus
MAHINDER SINGH MANJIT – Respondent


K. RAMAMOORTHY

( 1 ) THE plaintiff bank has filed this suit for recovery of Rs. 3,88,507. 55 against the defendant No. I firm and three partners defendants 2 to 4.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY stated the case of the plaintiff is this. The defendants 2 to 4 being the partners or defendant No. 1 approached the plaintiff bank on 14. 1. 84 and opened an account and requested overdraft facility in the current account and adhoc/casual basis. The overdraft facility was allowed Subsequently, on 28. 8. 85 the defendants confirmed the debit balance in their account at Rs. 4. 56. 755 80. In December 1985 the defendants 2 to 4 requested for a temporary overdraft facility to the extent of Rs. 4 lakhs. This request was also acceded to by the plaintiff. On 23rd of December 1985 they executed the following documents :- 1. Demand Promissory Note. 2. Form No 106 3. Form No 291 4. Form No 216 5. Form No, 126 6. Form No. 159 After giving credits to the amounts paid by the defendants, the plaintiff bank issued notice calling upon them to pay the balance due. The balance as on February 16, 1987 was Rs. 3,88,507. 55. The plaintiff claims interest at 17. 5% per annum with quarterly rests. According to plaintiff, the defe















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top